Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 125
ROBINSON v. OFFICERS DOE #1-5
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff: ANGELA ROBINSON
Defendant: OFFICERS DOE #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01662
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MAJORS v. DOE et al
as 1:2021cv01130
Defendant: JOHN DOE #2, LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LIVE PD and others
Plaintiff: LESTER MAJORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00556
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fralish v. Capital One NA et al
as 3:2021cv00162
Defendant: Capital One NA, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and Does 1-100
Plaintiff: John Fralish
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691
MAJORS v. DOE et al
as 3:2021cv00029
Defendant: JOHN DOE #2, LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LIVE PD and others
Plaintiff: LESTER MAJORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THAYYIL v. INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2021cv00165
Defendant: NOS. 1-25 JOHN DOES, INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES and others
Plaintiff: Michael Thayyil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2020cv02979
Plaintiff: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
Defendant: MICHELLE METCALF, RICHARD BROWN, RON NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOHLSEN v. GEIST PATROL, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02283
Defendant: OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-30 and GEIST PATROL, INC.
Plaintiff: THOMAS BOHLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS-TYLER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv01884
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff: Constance Woods-Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?