Cases 21 - 30 of 40
v. Employment Development Department State of California
as 3:2015cv00606
Defendant:
Employment Development Department State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Marth Jo Peters v. Employment Development Department et al
as 5:2014cv00021
Defendant:
David Cohn, Kamala Harris, Marriott Hotel Inc and others
"EDD":
Employment Development Department
Plaintiff:
Martha Jo Peters
Commissioner / Judge:
John Vineyard
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Perales v. US House of Representatives, Standing Committee on Appropriations et al
as 1:2012fp00140
Defendant:
All Related Defendants, CA Attorney General Office, Department of Justice Public Inquiry, CA Department of Motor Vehicles and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-55989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reza Nagahi v. California Employment Developm, et al
as 11-17320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REZA NAGAHI
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DEBORAH BRONOW, JAMES CRAWLEY and others
Driscoll v. Harris et al
as 3:2011cv01789
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Driscoll
Defendant:
Pamela Harris , James A. Nesom , Employment Development Department for State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
