Cases 21 - 30 of 532
Deanna Robinson v. US
as 23-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANNA ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16023
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16022
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ANDREW D. PARKER, PARKER DANIELS KIBORT, LLC, KURT B. OLSEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Scott v. Superior Court of Maricopa County et al
as 2:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona Department of Corrections, Circle K Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connie Ford v. US
as 23-1508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONNIE FORD
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Audrey Lessner v. US
as 23-1507
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE, OCERINE COOPER and others
Not Yet Classified:
AUDREY LESSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Gomez-Shaw et al v. White et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gomez-Shaw and Mary Lou Caballero
Defendant:
Susan White, Unknown White, Janette C Corral and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Johnson and Dorothy Dale-Chambers
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, City of Phoenix Police Department, Arizona Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
April Fox v. US
as 23-1273
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Appellant:
APRIL FOX
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Sara Ybarra-Johnson v. US
as 23-1269
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Not Yet Classified:
SARA YBARRA-JOHNSON and SARA ELIZABETH YBARRA JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
