Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PIPPEN v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00661
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PIPPEN
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC., NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fairley v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
as 5:2009cv00406
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fairley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cassidy v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Motor Vehicles et al
as 5:2009cv00275
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Motor Vehicles, William C. Gore, jr., Daniel DeVane and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
