Cases 21 - 30 of 349
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patrick Takuanyi v. South St. Paul Police Dept.
as 22-3469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrick Takuanyi
Defendant / Appellee:
City of South St. Paul, Police Department
Washington v. City of St. Paul et al
as 0:2022cv02899
Plaintiff:
Joseph Washington
Defendant:
City of St. Paul, Anthony Dean, Colleen Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Adams v. City of St Paul et. al.
as 0:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
Frankie Edward Adams
Defendant:
City of St Paul et. al. and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of St. Paul et al
as 0:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Matilda Ann Smith
Defendant:
City of Saint Paul, John Corcoran, Michael Tschida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Patrick Takuanyi v. South St. Paul Police Dept.
as 22-1034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrick Takuanyi
Defendant / Appellee:
City of South St. Paul, Police Department
DENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv20623
Plaintiff:
EMMALEE DENT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
