Cases 21 - 30 of 202
Colmenero v. Dettelbach
as 23-10802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angela Colmenero, Attorney General, State of Texas, David Schnitz, Tracy Martin and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity as Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Brady v. Matt Grimm, et al
as 23-55359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH BRADY
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT GRIMM, Chief Operating Officer, Anuril Industries, ANURIL INDUSTRIES, a California Limited Liability Company, Irvine, California, LESLIE GARDNER, as Executive Director of the San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center Carlsbad, California, in her official capacity and in her personal capacity and others
ELLERBE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ELLERBE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE E.D. OF PA, CHIEF JUDGE JUAN SANCHEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
