Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eric Bowker v. Ronald Bakeman, et al
as 09-3552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC S. BOWKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD B. BAKEMAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, in his individual and official capacity, DEANE R. HASSMAN, Special Agent, in his individual and official capacity, GORDON S. FRIEDMAN, Attorney, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
ALL OFFICERS OF THE U.S. PROBATION OFFICE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, Judge, Trumbull County, TINA KNIGHT and others
Bowker v. Bakeman et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Erik S. Bowker
Defendant:
Ronald Bakeman, Deane Hassman, Gordon Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ward v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv02535
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ward
Defendant:
City of Chicago, N. J. Wedster and B. M. Westcott
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv06629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Westcott, et al v. Albrecht, et al
as 3:2002cv02300
Defendant:
Unknown Williams, Rebecca A Albrecht, Lex Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Westcott and Chris R Caplanis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ober v. Evanko, et al
as 1:2001cv00084
Defendant:
Joseph Westcott, Hawthorne Conley, Thomas Coury and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell G. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
