Civil Rights Cases filed in Vermont matching "Apple, Inc."
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,820
Loewen v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv02006
Plaintiff: Erik D. Loewen
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant: APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner: PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
TOT Power Control, S.L. v. Apple Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff: TOT Power Control, S.L.
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Not Yet Classified: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007 Petition to compel attendance before arbitrator
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as NJ/2:24-CV-04055
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant: APPLE INC.
618Media Dijital Hizmetler Limited Sirketi v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02952
Plaintiff: 618Media Dijital Hizmetler Limited Sirketi
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
MUKHERJEE v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06131
Plaintiff: AYAN MUKHERJEE
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
BALOGH et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv06049
Plaintiff: CONNIE BALOGH, GEORGE BAUMAN, BRIDGET COLLINS and others
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Shekhovtsov v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2024cv02311
Plaintiff: Stanislav Shekhovtsov
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
R.N Nehushtan Trust Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff: R.N NEHUSHTAN TRUST LTD.
Defendant: APPLE INC.
ARENDS v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv05961
Plaintiff: NICOLE ARENDS
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?