Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00848
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jackson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cunningham v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv00313
Plaintiff:
Saundra L Cunningham
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Arizona Department of Corrections , Carson McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wallace v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
Barbara C Wallace
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Michael Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rattler v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 4:2011cv00777
Plaintiff:
Leo Rattler
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dodd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv01838
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dodd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona State Prison Complex, Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seawright v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv01304
Plaintiff:
Kini M Seawright
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heitzmann v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2011cv00762
Plaintiff:
Albert Karl Heitzmann
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
