Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00874
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stritzinger v. Carne
as 16-3887
Petitioner - Appellant:
John S. Stritzinger
Respondent - Appellee:
Edward Earl Carnes, Chief Judge of the 11th Circuit, Lowell McAdam, Chief Executive of Verizon, Sarah Deutsche, SVP of Verizon Legal and others
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 16-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond, CAO and others
Quach et al v. Cao et al
as 4:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
John Quach, Tug Tin Mathesius, Max Mathesius and others
Defendant:
City of Novato, City of Novato Police Department, James Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Cao v. Li et al
as 1:2015cv08945
Plaintiff:
Jin Ming Cao
Defendant:
Jian Li, So Suet, Guo Xiang Hu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jingrong et al v. Chinese Anti-Cult World Alliance et al
as 1:2015cv01046
CACWA:
Chinese Anti-Cult World Alliance
Defendant:
Michael Chu, Does 1-5, Wan Hongjuan and others
Plaintiff:
Zhang Cuiping, Bian Hexiang, Zhang Jingrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jingrong et al v. Chinese Anti-Cult World Alliance (CACWA) et al
as 1:2015cv01450
Plaintiff:
Zhang Jingrong , Zhou Yanhua , Zhang Peng and others
Defendant:
Chinese Anti-Cult World Alliance (CACWA), Michael Chu, Li Huahong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Johnson v. Cao et al
as 2:2014cv01453
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Frank P Cao, Trang M Nguyen and Fair Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Oquendo v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02582
Defendant:
Sgt. Viet W. Cao, City of New York and Captain Daniel Sosnowik
Plaintiff:
Joseph Oquendo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
