Cases 31 - 40 of 210
Cargill et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff:
Michael Cargill and CTC HGC, LLC
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 923 - Review of Firearms Licensing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Steven Daurio v. Mike Faust, et al
as 22-15248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN LOUIS DAURIO
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE FAUST, Director of the Department of Child Safety
Defendant:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, GREG MCKAY, ELIZABETH A. REYNOLDS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Yankey v. Kansas Bureau of Investigation et al
as 6:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Desmond Yankey, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas Bureau of Investigation, Shawn Winfield, KAKE News and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
