Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01755
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evelyn Bevis, et al v. City of New Orleans, et al
as 11-30711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVELYN ALEXIS BEVIS, Individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated, SCOTT IRA ZATZKIS, JULIETTE M. NEVES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, through its administration and its counsel and AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
Evelyn Bevis v. City of New Orleans
as 11-30711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Evelyn Alexis Bevis, Individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated, Scott Ira Zatzkis, Juliette M. Neves and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New Orleans, through its administration and its counsel and American Traffic Solutions, Incorporated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COBLE v. SUPT. ASST. DAMITER et al
as 2:2011cv01891
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY COBLE
Defendant:
SUPT. ASST. DAMITER, DEP. WARDEN KEPHARDT, DEP. WARDEN KEVALCHICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010at00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
