Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Joseph Phillips, Jr. v. Richard James, et al
as 14-2768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH D PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD JAMES, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Durham v. Suny Rockland Community College et al
as 1:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
Alfie Shannbay Durham
Defendant:
Suny Rockland Community College, Suzanne D. Phillips and Jonathan Barnwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael's Restaurant & Sports Bar, Inc. et al v. Village of Fishkill et al
as 7:2013cv08392
Plaintiff:
Michael's Restaurant & Sports Bar, Inc. and Michael Lynch
Defendant:
Village of Fishkill , James J. Miccio , Peter D. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koltun v. Berry et al
as 1:2013cv01612
Plaintiff:
Victor Koltun
Defendant:
Jeffrey Berry, B. Harold Ramsey, Aaron Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kevin Miller v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 11-18045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, PAUL SCHINDLER, Sacramento Police Officer, Badge # 702, V. WALKER, Sacramento Police Officer, Badge # 0549 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
George Richardson v. Somerset Apartments, et al
as 11-14602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE M. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SOMERSET APARTMENTS, ATC DEVELOPMENT, WILLIAM R. BELANGIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
