Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Reisinger v. Conner et al
as 3:2012cv02553
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Richard L. Conner, Prashant Shitut , Joseph Butkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reisinger v. Connor et al
as 3:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Richard L. Connor, Prashant Shitut, Joseph Butkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barr v. Barbieri et al
as 3:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Barr
Defendant:
Alexis L. Barbieri, John C. Bear , Lisa M. Boscola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv07111
Plaintiff:
DAVID CROCKETT
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, PASQUALE T. DEON, SR., JAMES C. SCHWARTZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT V. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv04008
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, SEPTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS, SEPTA MANAGERS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CROCKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
