Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doe et al v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2013cv01701
Plaintiff:
John Doe , Jane Doe and James Doe
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin , Victor Payne and James Craig Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Tuscaloosa County Board of Education et al
as 7:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Board of Education , Butch Young , Stephen Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Loder et al v. McKinney
as 2:2011cv00979
Plaintiff:
Charelle Loder , Jack Doe , Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
Reese McKinney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. City of Alabaster, Alabama et al
as 2:2011cv03448
Plaintiff:
John Doe, I , John Doe, II , John Doe III and others
Defendant:
City of Alabaster, Alabama, City of Pelham, Alabama, City of Hoover, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Demopolis, City of et al
as 2:2009cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Demopolis, City of, Demopolis, City of, Terrance Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Demopolis, City of et al
as 1:2009cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Demopolis, City of, Terrance Smith and Terrance Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Demopolis, City of et al
as 5:2008cv02078
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Demopolis, City of and Terrance Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe et al v. City of Pelham et al
as 2:2007cv00478
Plaintiff:
John Doe, John Doe II, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
City of Pelham, Alabama, City of Pelham, Alabama, City of Pelham, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
