Cases 31 - 40 of 165
TUFFY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv03083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUFFY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corsini v. Brodsky
as 17-1461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gerard Andrew Corsini
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Brodsky, The Brodsky Organization, LLC, 433 West Associates, LLC and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Jane Does 1-25
MURRAY et al v. COUNTY OF HUDSON et al
as 2:2017cv02875
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MURRAY , PATRICIA AIKEN and EDPDLAW, LTD.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HUDSON, HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THOMAS A. DEGISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TENAGLIA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
DAVID TENAGLIA
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Filing Error
as 3:2016cv02226
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Phillips
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Management and Training Corporation, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FOSTER v. THE COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY et al
as 2:2016cv03598
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOSTER
Defendant:
THE COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY, WHYY, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.A. et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04936
Plaintiff:
K.A. , S.A. , L.R. and others
Defendant:
City Of New York, Corizon Health Inc. , Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
