Cases 31 - 40 of 32,964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gary v. Dorchester Court et al
as 1:2024cv11529
Plaintiff:
Robert L Gary
Defendant:
Dorchester Court and Attorney Stuart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carter v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyya Carter
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, Suicide Prevention and Crisis Services, Inc., Mia Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Emrit v. Marco Rubio, et al
as 24-2094
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political ActionCommittee/Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
SENATOR MARCO RUBIO, SENATOR RICK SCOTT, R-Florida, SENATOR CHRIS COONS, D-Maryland and others
Barfell v. Team Honey Badger Dominos
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Team Honey Badger Dominos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Barfell v. AMP
as 1:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
AMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. The State of Florida
as 3:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Deandre L. Williams
Defendant:
The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Renfrew v. SunVan et al
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Maritza L. Renfrew
Defendant:
SunVan and City of Albuquerque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
