Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Martin Lindstedt v. Terry Neff, et al
as 15-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Luther Lindstedt, The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri
Defendant:
Newton County, Missouri, Newton County Sheriff's Department, Ken Copeland, Newton County Sheriff and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Terry Neff, Attorney, The Honorable Kevin L. Selby and The Honorable Timothy Perigo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv03009
Plaintiff:
Michel Thomas
Defendant:
Horace J. Johnson, Jr., Harrill L. Dawkins, Stephen B. Farrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rodriguez v. Newton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Ana L Rodriguez
Defendant:
Newton County Sheriff's Department , Newton County Jail , Lake County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durden v. Newton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Latish Durden
Defendant:
Newton County, Georgia , Ezell Brown , Newton County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Brown v. Busch et al
as 4:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Craig F Brown
Defendant:
Thomas Busch, Les Meade, Karen Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Church of Jesus Christ Christian et al v. Newton County et al
as 3:2013cv05020
Plaintiff:
Martin Luther Lindstedt
Defendant:
Newton County, Missouri, Newton County Sheriff's Department, Ken Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
