Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Brock v. Issaquena County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00862
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Brock
Defendant:
Issaquena County, Mississippi , Warren County, Mississippi , City of Vicksburg, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Premo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv08141
Plaintiff:
Michael Premo
Defendant:
The City of New York, Richard Jones and Trevor Bosco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lori LaCroix v. Richard Jones, et al
as 12-3846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD JONES, BARRY BOHANNON and JOHN GEORGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Richard Jones v. City of Memphis, et al
as 12-5558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS and JILL MADAJCZKY, Senior Assistant City Attorney for Memphis
Green Mountain Financial Fund, v. Lori LaCroix, et al
as 12-2158
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGUERITE DOWNS RAPPAPORT, TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA, LOIS GARRETT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vinokur et al v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv00911
Plaintiff:
Emilia Vinokur and PAAPO
Defendant:
Robert Wagner, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, John D. Clunk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KEELER v. CITY OF HAMMONTON et al
as 1:2011cv02745
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEELER
Defendant:
CITY OF HAMMONTON , RICHARD JONES , HAMMONTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence v. Warren County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lawrence
Defendant:
Warren County, Mississippi , Martin Pace , Issaquena County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
