Cases 41 - 50 of 151
Jackson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv01864
Defendant:
K. Knutson, State of Minnesota, N. Pelosi and others
Plaintiff:
Howard G Jackson and Howard G. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oman v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2019cv01344
Defendant:
Officer Mohamed Noor, Officer Justin Schmidt and City of Minneapolis
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Oman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. City of Chaska et al
as 0:2019cv00855
Defendant:
Police Officer Mueler, City of Chaska and Police Officer Personious
Plaintiff:
Dennis C. Lackey
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1421
Baylor v. Eto et al
as 0:2019cv00442
Defendant:
Hennepin County Child Support, Ms. Ayano Eto, Mr. Lee. R Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gary Baylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. St. Louis County Public Health & Human Services et al
as 0:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Laura Yoki, Lon Yoki, St. Louis County Public Health & Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Jorgenson, Aimee Renee Johnson, Aimee Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sayen v. Schurrer et al
as 0:2018cv03417
Defendant:
Gary R. Schurrer, Thaddeaus V. Jude and John C. Hoffman
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Sayen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv03188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howdahl v. Gustafson et al
as 0:2018cv02903
Defendant:
Roseau, County of, Steve Gust, Kelly Gustafson and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Howdahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. AEON Management, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv02436
Defendant:
Shanon Ployhart, Colin Burkholder, EPG Security Group and others
Plaintiff:
Warren F. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv01998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
