Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jackson v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2012cv02127
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs and United States of America Merit Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Key v. Jackson
as 4:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
Joni Key
Defendant:
David Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilliam v. Jackson
as 4:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Gary Gilliam
Defendant:
David Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilliam v. Jackson
as 4:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Gary Gilliam
Defendant:
David Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Hannen, et al
as 12-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MARK HANNEN, Judge, 18th Judicial District, in his official capacity, TAMMY L. HERIVEL, Clerk of Arapahoe County, Colo., in her official capacity and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General, in his official capacity
Jackson v. Hannen, et al
as 12-1045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MARK HANNEN, Judge, 18th Judicial District, in his official capacity, TAMMY L. HERIVEL, Clerk of Arapahoe County, Colo., in her official capacity and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General, in his official capacity
Jackson v. Hannen et al
as 1:2011cv03312
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
J. Mark Hannen, John W. Suthers and Tammy L. Herivel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, APRILLE COLE, JAMIE BRAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
