Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00170
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BOUIE v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2014cv04730
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BOUIE
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON , PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOE 1-20 and others
Cross_claimant:
GIUSEPPE CIARLA and FLORENCE ACKERMAN
Cross_defendant:
GIUSEPPE CIARLA , FLORENCE ACKERMAN , GLENN L BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rau v. Cosentino
as 1:2014cv01414
Plaintiff:
Larry James Rau
Defendant:
Giuseppe Cosentino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mormone v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07231
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Erik Contreras and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Mormone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamendula v. Thevenot et al
as 1:2013cv07006
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Lamendula
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, The City of New York and NYC Police Officer Lesly Thevenot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tirone v. TSA
as 1:2013cv01577
Transportation Security Agency:
TSA
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Tirone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GATTUSO et al v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
VINCENT GATTUSO and MICHAEL BLASZCZYK
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, ROBERT M. DAMMINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
