Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09929
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Beltran et al v. McHenry Township Board of Trustees et al
as 3:2018cv50317
Plaintiff:
Abigail Adams, Ken Boettcher, Amanda Blake and others
Defendant:
McHenry Township Board of Trustees, Bob Anderson, James Condon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nation v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv03984
Plaintiff:
Emma Nation
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, United States, Ben Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nation v. Trump et al
as 4:2018cv03984
Defendant:
Humboldt Bay Housing Development Corporation, Ben Carson, Mr. Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Nation, Myers Rose and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gottlieb et al v. Tyler et al
as 1:2018cv22428
Plaintiff:
Allen B. Gottlieb, Phyllis Gottlieb, Rachel E. Gottlieb and others
Defendant:
Nancy Ellen Tyler and John Graubard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kilpatrick v. Gottlieb
as 18-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory D. Kilpatrick
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. Scott Gottlieb, Commissioner - F.D.A.
South Mountain Creamery, LLC v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2018cv00738
Plaintiff:
South Mountain Creamery, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Scott Gottlieb and Russell C. Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Lazarus et al
as 0:2018cv60629
Plaintiff:
Michelle Craig
Defendant:
Joel Lazarus, John Olson, Robin R. Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
