Cases 41 - 50 of 291
Smith et al v. Grant et al
as 2:2021cv02302
Defendant:
JANE DOE, City of Dyersburg Tennessee, LOGAN ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia Currie, Charmin Smith, Tyrone L Smith, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Barnett v. Hawkins County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Hawkins County, Tennessee, Michael Martin, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lobozzo v. Blount County et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Defendant:
James Berrong, Keith Gregory, Blount County and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Lobozzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Knox County et al (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Macey Holt, John and Jane Doe Jailers/Guards, Tyesha Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
jason johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, David B. Rausch and others
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00041
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, Tennessee, Jane Doe, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Newsom and Thomas Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cowart v. City of Pulaski, Tennessee et al
as 1:2020cv00072
Defendant:
City of Pulaski, Tennessee, Kerry T. Gilbert, John and Jane Doe #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Cowart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
