Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Moore v. Lusks et al
as 4:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Britain Moore
Defendant:
Saul Lusks, Willie Murdock, Milton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. Martin
as 4:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Mark Moore , Michael Harrod and William Chris Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Sayres v. Felts et al
as 3:2013cv03096
Plaintiff:
Robert Sayres
Defendant:
John Felts, Mike Moore, Jamin B. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duit Construction Company Inc v. Bennett et al
as 4:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
Duit Construction Company Inc
Defendant:
Scott Bennett, Frank Vozel, Emmanual Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
White v. Stodola et al
as 4:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Clifton R White
Defendant:
Mark Stodola , Little Rock, City of , Bruce Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv00793
Plaintiff:
Curtis Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture, Gary Cochran, Hendra Woodfork and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
