Cases 41 - 50 of 2,594
Castro Donato v. Torres et al
as 8:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Juan Donato Castro Personal Representative and Juan Castro Donato
Defendant:
Maria Torres, Grady Judd, Deputy Maria Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Warner, et al v. City of Marathon, et al
as 24-10901
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. WARNER, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II, JOHN W. PARENTE, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II and JOSEPH E. ARDOLINO, individually
Defendant:
CITY OF MARATHON, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, MICHAEL CINQUE, individually and as a City of Marathon Official, RALPH LUCIGNANO, individually and as a City of Marathon Official and others
Amya Sparger-Withers v. Joshua Taylor, et al
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
AMYA SPARGER-WITHERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
JOSHUA N. TAYLOR, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as civil-forfeiture prosecutor, BLACKFORD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, in his official capacity, DEARBORN AND OHIO COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
ROY L. AUSTIN, JR., et al. (55 Current and Former Elected Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders, and Former Attorneys General, U.S. Attorneys, and U.S. Department of Justice Officials), FINES AND FEES JUSTICE CENTER and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS
Terenzio, et al v. Urena, et al
as 24-1244
Plaintiff:
DELMA TERENZIO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph A. Terenzio, THOMAS SULLIVAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John J. Sullivan and EDWARD POULIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maurice C. Poulin
Defendant:
FRANCISCO URENA, MARYLOU SUDDERS and CHERYL LUSSIER POPPE
Lee v. Capital One Auto Financing
as 24-20100
Plaintiff:
Ryon Dior Lee
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Financing, Dereyk Fields, an individual in his personal capacity, off duty Officer for Harris County Sheriff Department, Kenneth Massey, an individual in his personal capacity, off duty Officer for Harris County Sheriff Department and others
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1601
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in hr official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Hennings et al v. NYPD Commissioner et al
as 1:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
Velyn Hennings
Defendant:
NYPD Commissioner, Stephen K Benjamin, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnny Miles v. City of Hazlehurst, Georgia, et al
as 24-10885
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY MILES, as Surviving Parent of Abdul Jabar Furcron, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abdul Jabar Furcron, Deceased
Defendant:
CITY OF HAZLEHURST, GEORGIA, A municipality organized under the laws of the State of Georgia, PHILLIP A. BENNETT, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Hazlehurst Police Officer and JOSE GAULDALUPE ZAMORA, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Hazlehurst Police Officer
Abulkhair v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Assem A. Abulkhair
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller, III, James B. Comey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dion Horton, et al v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos, et al
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, in her official capacity, FRANK J. SCHERER, DIRECTOR OF ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, in his official capacity, ANTHONY M. MARIANI, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
