Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Laura Clark, et al v. Oakhill Condominiums Associati, et al
as 11-1991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURA S. CLARK, STEPHEN R. CLARK and SEJCO VENTURES LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
OAKHILL CONDOMINIUMS ASSOCIATION INC., DAVID ANTHONY, in his capacity as President of the Board of Directors of Oakhill Condominiums Association Inc., TOM REGNIER, in his capacity as a Director of Oakhill Condominiums Association Inc. and others
ANDERSON et al v. COPE et al
as 5:2009cv04330
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBERT ANDERSON and SHEILLA ANDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. COPE, TODD A. CESSNA, CODY S. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Glenna S. Clark and Glenna S. Clark
Defendant:
Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc., Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc. and Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Clark v. Oakhill Condominiums Association Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Laura S Clark, Laura S Clark, SEJCO Ventures LLC and others
Defendant:
Oakhill Condominiums Association Inc, David Anthony, Tom Regnier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
American Atheists, et al v. Duncan, et al
as 08-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC, a Texas non-profit corporation, R. ANDREWS, S. CLARK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT T. DUNCAN, Colonel, Superintendent, Utah Highway Patrol, JOHN NJORD, Executive Director, Utah Department of Transportation and F. KEITH STEPAN, Director Division of Facilities Construction and Management Department of Administrative Services
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL ASSOCIATION
Not A Party In Lower Court - Amicus Curiae:
THE UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION, THE UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, THE SOCIETY FOR HUMANISTIC JUDAISM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
