Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moore v. Oklahoma City, City of et al
as 5:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Wesley T Moore
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of and Daniel Godsil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MacFall v. City of Rochester
as 10-4638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David S. MacFall, Stephen B. Tortora, Stephen J. Ward and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Rochester, David T. Moore, Chief, George Market, Executive Deputy Chief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DePonceau v. United States of America
as 10-3762
Defendant:
K. Hollenbeck, Elmira Correctional Facility, Patrick Crough, Investigator, Hiver, Lieutenant and others
Appellee:
Michael Zeigiller, Reporter, David T. Moore, Rochester Police Chief, Robert J. Lunn, Appellate Division and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moore et al v. SHEAHAN et al
as 1:2010cv05578
Plaintiff:
Sheila A Moore , HERNANDOS T MOORE , NICOLE BARNES and others
Defendant:
RYAN SHEAHAN and MARLON BURTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kase v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2010cv06476
Plaintiff:
Justin Kase
Defendant:
City of Rochester, City of Rochester Police Department, David T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
