Cases 41 - 50 of 213
Ragland v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Shelia Ragland
Defendant:
City of Jackson, James Davis, Anthony Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth et al v. The City of Jackson et al
as 3:2021cv00763
Plaintiff:
ReSheenda Booth and Milton Jackson
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Jackson Police Department, Officer Corry Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
RaSean Thomas
Defendant:
City of Jackson and Willie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Vicari v. Jackson et al
as 2:2021cv02117
Plaintiff:
Donald Angelo Vicari
Defendant:
Harman Jackson, Jackson Police Department and City of Jackson, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dinkins et al v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2021cv00271
Defendant:
Hinds County Department of Emergency Managament, John Does 1-10, Hinds County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Tameka Dinkins and Rosalind Yarber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. City of Jackson, a municipal corporation et al
as 3:2021cv10749
Defendant:
Matthew Hagerty, Gilbert Carlson, Bethany M Smith, City Attorney, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
Yellow House LLC, Accrual Investments LLC, 1604 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson (El Bey) v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Defendant:
Fayette County, Amy P. Wierch, TN Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Erique Jermaine Richardson (El Bey)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
