Cases 51 - 60 of 67
WOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv02066
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOD
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , CHARLES KIEL , CHARANDIP SEKHON and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Smith v. Dean et al
as 1:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Dave Dean and Christopher Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fugate
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith
Defendant:
W. Craig Fugate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02900
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith
Defendant:
The City of New York, Kenneth O'Donnell, John Does 1-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De-Occupy Honolulu et al v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2012cv00668
Plaintiff:
De-Occupy Honolulu , Catherine Russell , Christopher Smith and others
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu , Westley Chun, Trish Morikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aibuedefe J Oghogho v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv08398
Defendant:
Reynaldo Amaya, Chief of Police Charlie Beck, Kendra Browne and others
Plaintiff:
Aibuedefe J Oghogho
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4696
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Gristina et al
as 7:2011cv02371
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Joseph Gristina, Gretchen Gristina, County of Orange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
