Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Allen Feingold v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, et al
as 10-1223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN L. FEINGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PAUL KILLION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
GRAHAM v. COUNTY OF CLARION et al
as 2:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. GRAHAM
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CLARION, CLARION COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, JAMES G. ARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nina Shahin v. Pamela Darling, et al
as 09-3298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NINA SHAHIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA A. DARLING, Justice of Peace Court #16 for Kent County, MERRILL TRADER, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Kent County, ROSEMARY BEAUREGARD, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas Sussex County and others
SALZMAN v. BUCKS COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT DOMESTIC RELATION DIVISION et al
as 2:2008cv05404
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. SALZMAN
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT DOMESTIC RELATION DIVISION and BUCKS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Donald Watkins, Jr. v. Elica Blocker, et al, et al
as 08-3784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD WATKINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET THERESA MURPHY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS COURT and ELICA BLOCKER, COURT EMPLOYEE
Herring v. Stark County Common Pleas Court et al
as 5:2007cv01553
Plaintiff:
Jamy Ray Herring
Defendant:
Stark County Common Pleas Court, Stark County Commissioners and Charles E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Presiding Judge, Stark County Common Pleas Court et al
as 5:2007cv01206
Plaintiff:
Tammy (Wadian) Adams
Defendant:
Presiding Judge, Stark County Common Pleas Court and Presiding Judge, Harrison Common Pleas Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
