Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Nicholas Bauer v. Phil Reidda, et al
as 10-2844
Plaintiff - Appellant: NICHOLAS R. BAUER
Defendant - Appellee: PHIL REIDDA, MARK AGHAKHAN, MARTHA BELLEW-SMITH and others
Daniel Waterman v. Phil Reidda, et al
as 10-2847
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL R. WATERMAN
Defendant - Appellee: PHIL REIDDA, MARK AGHAKHAN, MARTHA BELLEW-SMITH and others
Brad Siever v. Phil Reidda, et al
as 10-2845
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRAD A. SIEVER
Defendant - Appellee: PHIL REIDDA, MARK AGHAKHAN, MARTHA BELLEW-SMITH and others
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Mark Aghakhan, et al
as 10-2846
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: MARK AGHAKHAN, PHIL REIDDA, MARTHA BELLEW-SMITH and others
Martin v. Reid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01281
Plaintiff: Tramaine E. Martin
Defendant: Bob Reid, Anna K. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson Paez v. Michael Lynch, et al
as 10-1250
Plaintiff - Appellant: NELSON PAEZ
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL LYNCH and COUNTY OF HUDSON
Defendant - Non-Participating: E. MARTIN, N BERGEN and JOSEPH RAO
Stanley Martin, Jr. v. Byran Bartow
as 09-3948
Plaintiff - Appellant: STANLEY E. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: BYRAN BARTOW
Hall v. Martin et al
as 2:2009cv02568
Defendant: Joyce E. Martin and Garnett, Kansas, City of
Plaintiff: George Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosa Pringle v. Daniel Martin, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2156
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROSA LEE PRINGLE
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL H. MARTIN, JR., a/k/a Daniel E. Martin, Sr., aka Former Judge Daniel E. Martin, Sr.,Former Atty Daniel E. Martin, Sr., Nickname Atty Danny Jr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00714
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?