Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Number 776 v. Getttysburg Borough et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Number 776
Defendant:
Getttysburg Borough and Joseph F. Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10993
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Richardson v. City of Niagara Falls, New Yor
as 12-587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Niagara Falls, New York, The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Joint Council No. 46 and others
Coates v. City of Niagara Fall
as 12-596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Coates
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Niagara Falls, New York, The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Joint Council No. 46 and The International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local No. 264
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-5361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05697
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
