Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Maldonado et al v. City of San Leandro Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Elsa Maldonado and Rene Maldonado
Defendant:
City of San Leandro Police Department, P. J. Kyle, Michael Sobek and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Glasgow v. Allen
as 2:2008cv00801
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glasgow, Kenneth Glasgow, Kenneth Glasgow and others
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nicoletti v. Powell et al
as 7:2008cv08130
Plaintiff:
Mary Nicoletti
Defendant:
Richard Allen Powell and Wappingers Central School District
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arthur v. Allen et al
as 1:2008cv00441
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur, Thomas D. Arthur and Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Grant Culliver, Stephen Billy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dill v. Allen et al
as 2:2007cv02239
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dill
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Allen et al
as 1:2007cv00681
Plaintiff:
Sherri Arthur Stone
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Grantt Culliver, Michael F. Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moore v. Potter, et al
as 07-20624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS AFL-CIO and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, Branch 283
Jacobs v. Bright et al
as 2:2007cv00675
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jacobs
Defendant:
Bobby N. Bright, Richard Allen and The City of Montgomery, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
