Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 142
Darrell Harris v. Police Nathan Ulmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL P. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee: POLICE NATHAN ULMER, in both his official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department and SERGEANT NATALIE PRESTON, in both her official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department
Defendant: BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department, 6 UNKNOWN POLICE & K9 DOG, in both their official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department and others
Lomax et al v. O'Ree et al
as 1:2016cv01612
Plaintiff: Larry Lomax , Albert Tubman , Eric Glass and others
Defendant: Christopher O'Ree , Keith Gladstone , Joseph Landsman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03734
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Marlow Humbert v. Baltimore City Police Dept
as 15-2461
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLOW HUMBERT
Defendant - Appellee: BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FREDERICK BEALEFELD, Police Commissioner Individually and as Police Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department, SHEILA DIXON, former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, in her individual capacity and others
Defendant: MICHAEL BRASSELL, Police Officer Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, CINESE CALDWELL, Laboratory Technician individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, DOMINICK GRIFFIN, Detective Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Marlow Humbert v. Mayor and City Council of Balt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1768
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLOW HUMBERT
Defendant - Appellee: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, SHEILA DIXON, former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, in her individual capacity, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant: CHRIS JONES, Detective Sergeant Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, MARTIN O'MALLEY, Individually and as Governor of the State of Maryland and former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, KEITH MERRYMAN, Detective Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Schuerholz v. Coker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01990
Plaintiff: Jaclyn Schuerholz
Defendant: Eugene Coker , R. Cabreja , Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clayton v. Baltimore City Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv01663
Plaintiff: Joseph Clayton
Defendant: Baltimore City Police Department , Anthony W. Batts , Timothy T. Spearman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Makia Smith v. Baltimore City Police Dept. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1604
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAKIA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICER KENNETH CAMPBELL, in both his official and individual capacity as an officer of the Baltimore City Police Department and OFFICER NATHAN CHURCH, in both his official and individual capacity as an officer of the Baltimore City Police Department
Defendant: BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department, OFFICER WILLIAM PILKERTON, JR., in both his official and individual capacity as an officer of the Baltimore City Police Department and others
Clayton v. Baltimore City Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01626
Plaintiff: Joseph Clayton
Defendant: Baltimore City Police Department , Anthony W. Batts, Timothy T. Spearman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?