Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Grant v. Office of the Secretary of Defense
as 5:2019cv00004
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Office of the Secretary of Defense, Missile Defense Agency, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Special Collection Service
as 3:2019cv00248
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Special Collection Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Uphues et al v. Law Offices of William R. Satterberg, Jr. et al
as 4:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Law Offices of William R. Satterberg, Jr., Thomas Temple and Amy Welch
Plaintiff:
Donna Uphues and Barbara Tangwall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pederson v. Morse et al
as 3:2018cv00252
Defendant:
Michael Corey, William Morse, Andrew Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney S. Pederson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowl et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Anas A. Dowl and Ernest A. Jacobsson
Defendant:
Dean Williams , Clare Sullivan , April Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rifley v. Municipality of Anchorage Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Tyler Fredrick Rifley
Defendant:
Municipality of Anchorage Police Department and James Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bently et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bently, Jacob Brown, Charles Brady and others
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Jeff Edwards and Kate Burkhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tangwall v. William R. Satterberg, JR, Law Firm et al
as 4:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Donald Tangwall
Defendant:
William R. Satterberg, JR, Law Firm, Amy K Welch and Ben A. Seekins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
