Cases 51 - 60 of 63
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Garland v. Whyte et al
as 5:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Robert Garland
Defendant:
Sean Whyte and Jones Day Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whyte v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Whyte
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department and Pablo Sanoreyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dantzler v. Africk et al
as 2:2009cv03703
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dantzler
Defendant:
Lance M Africk, Mary Ann Vial Lemmon, Karen Wells Roby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Whyte et al v. Praestantia Associates, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv01267
Plaintiff:
Bradley O. Whyte and Bradley O. Whyte
Defendant:
Praestantia Associates, LLC, Marcus Bergen, Michael R. Wray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Whyte v. Nassau Health Care Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv02399
Plaintiff:
Carol Whyte
Defendant:
Nassau Health Care Corporation, Nassau University Medical Center, Sharon Popper and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Whyte et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv01465
Plaintiff:
Emilia Whyte, Candace Lloyd and Mary Bull
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
