Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Gerald Johnson v. Carlos Eggleston, et al
as 13-3446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLOS EGGLESTON, and Individually, CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN and JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bratton v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Edward Bratton
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , Russell Davis , Richard Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Scott v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2012cv02992
Plaintiff:
Donald Scott
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , Rod Foley and Dana Lantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloban v. Mahoning Youngstown Community Action Partnership
as 4:2012cv02570
Plaintiff:
Thoedore J. Sloban
Defendant:
Mahoning Youngstown Community Action Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson et al v City of Youngstown, Ohio et al
as 4:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Desiree Johnson and Doretha Weston
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Ohio , Kevin Mercer and Patrick Mulligan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Youngstown Municipal Court
as 4:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
Edward Hawkins
Defendant:
Youngstown Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Bell v. Mr. Charles Sammarone, et al
as 12-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Phillip Jefferies One-Feather Bell
Defendant - Appellee:
Mr. Charles Sammarone, Mayor of Youngstown, Ohio, Mr. Jeff Kashchak, Kyle Ratliff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
