Cases 61 - 70 of 190
Rhoades v. County Commission of Marion County et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Defendant:
David Forsyth, John Doe, County Commission of Marion County and others
Plaintiff:
Christy J. Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petrey v. Muhs et al
as 5:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
Rose Petrey
Defendant:
Aaron Muhs, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Pintez et al
as 1:2018cv00151
Defendant:
J.D. Morgan, John Doe and Sgt. Pintez
Plaintiff:
Alajuan Robinson and Reggie Robinson El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeVore et al v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
James DeVore , D. D. , Michael DeVore and others
Defendant:
J. C. Wetzel, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orem et al v. Gillmore et al
as 3:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
John W. Orem and Sher Orem
Defendant:
Matthew D. Gillmore and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crites et al v. Kanawha County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
Gary Crites and Hunter Crites
Defendant:
Kanawha County Sheriff's Department , Kanawha County Commission , City of Charleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Justus et al
as 1:2017cv03967
Plaintiff:
Jamie S. Justice
Defendant:
Ralph W. Justus, Jarod A. Tupper and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Justus et al
as 1:2017cv02336
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Ferguson
Defendant:
Ralph W. Justus, Dale Murray, James Coburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastman Chemical Company v. Lincoln County Commission et al
as 2:2017cv02268
Plaintiff:
Eastman Chemical Company
Defendant:
Lincoln County Commission, Charles Vance, Kerry Matthews, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disability Rights of West Virginia et al v. Crouch
as 2:2017cv01910
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights of West Virginia , John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Bill Crouch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
