Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02790
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701 Vocational Rehabilitation
HILL et al v. LAMB et al
as 4:2017cv00143
Defendant:
PAUL ANDRY, JOSHUA BABCOCK, JOHN DOE 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM HILL and WILLIAM SPRINKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GINSBACH v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2016cv02986
Defendant:
TERESA J. BROWN, RACHELL BULLOCK, CHRYSALIS COUNSELING CENTER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GINSBACH
In Her Professional Position As Asst. Law Director, And As Counsel For Rachell Bullock:
TARA WRIGHT-TIMBERLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norman v. B.E.T. Television et al
as 2:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
LaSandra Norman
Defendant:
B.E.T. Television, Steven Hill, Debra Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. DUNN et al
as 1:2016cv00691
Defendant:
HARRY C. DUNN and FLOYD PETERSON
Plaintiff:
A'DARRIUS HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Herny et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Defendant:
Marty Herny, Tommy Essiex, Coca Cola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
