Cases 61 - 70 of 3,577
Woods v. City of St. Ann, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods
Defendant:
City of St. Ann, Missouri, Aaron Jimenez, Stefan Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Schmalshof et al v. McDonough County, Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Evan Schmalshof and Schmalshof Family Transport LLC
Defendant:
McDonough County, Illinois and Nicholas Petitgout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pugh v. City of Antioch et al
as 4:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Terryonn Deshann Pugh
Defendant:
CIty of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Officer Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamie Cunningham v. Cobb County, Georgia, et al
as 24-10879
Plaintiff:
JAMIE CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA, EVAN MCDONALD, CHRISTOPHER LAKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Mike Pop v. Brookfield Chrysler Dodge Jeep, Inc., et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
MIKE POP
Defendant:
BROOKFIELD CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP, INC., a Michigan Corporation, GREGORY GUNTHER, ANDREW BEAM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
