Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 822
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison
Defendant / Appellee: MIDDLEBOROUGH, MA, MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough Public Schools, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND FAMILY, PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS
Brooks v. Department of Family and Children Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff: Olivia Rose Brooks
Defendant: Department of Family and Children Services and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13245
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA, INC., LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Intervenor: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13220
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richardson v. Cinceus
as 1:2023cv03371
Plaintiff: Temetrius Deonte Richardson and Temetrius Richardson
Defendant: G. Cinceus and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Griffith v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2023cv00152
Plaintiff: Lionel Joseph Griffith, Sr.
Defendant: State of Georgia and Coweta County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03213
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?