Cases 61 - 70 of 329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05974
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv81960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The GEO Group, Inc., et al v. Nikolas Robert Poole, et al
as 8:2020cv01750
Plaintiff:
The GEO Group, Inc., Roxanne Mendoza, City of Garden Grove and others
Defendant:
Nikolas Robert Poole and Moes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The GEO Group, Inc., et al v. Nikolas Robert Poole, et al
as 2:2020cv08268
Plaintiff:
The GEO Group, Inc., Roxanne Mendoza, City of Garden Grove and others
Defendant:
Nikolas Robert Poole and Moes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Penitentiary of New Mexico et al
as 1:2020cv00815
Defendant:
FNU Williams, Santa Fe County Adult Correctional Facility, FNU Franco and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bever v. Lawton Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2020cv00792
Defendant:
Lawton Correctional Facility and The Geo Group Inc doing business as GEO Corrections
Plaintiff:
James Bever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo v. Central New Mexico Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Marcos Trujillo and Marcus Trujillo
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Central New Mexico Correctional Facility, The GEO Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
