Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Talton v. Amalgamated Transit Union
as 6:2009cv06477
Plaintiff:
Michael Talton
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thrall v. CNY Centro, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thrall
Defendant:
CNY Centro, Inc., Charles Watson and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 580
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sylvia Darensburg, et al v. MTC
as 09-15878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVIA DARENSBURG, VIVIAN HAIN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 192 and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
PLANNERS NETWORK, ARCHITECTS/DESIGNERS/PLANNERS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, PLANNERS OF COLOR INTEREST GROUP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv60541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
