Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Ryan McFadyen v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
Ryan McFadyen v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
HARR v. BRODHEAD et al
as 1:2011cv00263
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
RICHARD H. BRODHEAD , DAVID F. LEVI and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALLEN v. DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ALLEN
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, PHYLLIS LEPPERT, M.D. and BEVERLY THORPE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
