Cases 81 - 90 of 1,437
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gonzalez-Del Hoyo v. Castle Rock, Town of et al
as 1:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzalez Del Hoyo and Carlos Gonzales-Del Hoyo
Defendant:
Castle Rock, Town of and Joseph Gondeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adeoye Adebowale v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-1964
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADEOYE O. ADEBOWALE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, DWAYNE C. DAVIS, Detective, Star No. 21075, JORGE GONZALES, Detective, Star No. 2040 and others
Gonzales v. Cashman et al
as 1:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Zane D. Gonzales
Defendant:
Megan Cashman
Intervenor Defendant:
Heather Cashman and Shaun Cashman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ruben Gonzales v. Express Coin Laundry et al
as 8:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
RUBEN GONZALES
Defendant:
EXPRESS COIN LAUNDRY, 1701 SANTA ANA PARTNERS LP, FRANNEA GISELA TR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination under A.D.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
