Cases 81 - 90 of 169
Romagnano v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Chase Anderson Romagnano
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Don Davis, Michael McMaken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00932
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe #1-5 (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown), Commissioner Joseph Ponte, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schenk v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv07185
Plaintiff:
Caroline Schenk
Defendant:
Robert Smith and United States Postal Service
Mary Boardman v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 14-4629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY BOARDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BROWNS SUPER STORE INC, DBA Shoprite of Oregon Avenue, OFFICER JAMES ARENTZEN, Badge No. 4681 and others
Hartnett et al v. Ensign, Kansas, City of et al
as 6:2014cv01394
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bruce Hartnett and Dennis L. Netherton
Defendant:
Ensign, Kansas, City of, Josh Watson, Jesus Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Famighetti et al
as 1:2014cv04913
Defendant:
John Doe and Sergeant Anthony Famighetti
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schenk v. United States Postal Serv
as 14-2603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Caroline Schenk
Defendant:
Robert Smith, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
