Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bridges-Walker v. Alliance Health et al
as 5:2021cv00336
Defendant:
Alliance Health, ALLIANCE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, Michelle Steva and others
Plaintiff:
Odaysia Bridges-Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez et al v. Winstead, II et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE.
as 4:2021cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jose R Ramirez and Francisca P Ramirez
Defendant:
Western Surety Company, John Thomas Winstead, II, Julian Keith Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez et al v. Winstead, II et al
as 5:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jose R Ramirez and Francisca P Ramirez
Defendant:
Western Surety Company, John Thomas Winstead, II, Julian Keith Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Sumner et al
as 5:2020cv00331
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Robert A. Evans, Lamont Wiggins, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Bey v. Stone et al
as 5:2019cv00540
Defendant:
A. Andrew, T. Carter, D. B. Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Barnard M R Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brathwaite-Bey v. Stone et al
as 5:2019cv00501
Defendant:
A. Andrew, T. Carter, D B Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Brathwaite-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Wilson County
as 5:2019cv00330
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Magistrate's Offices, Calvin Woodard, Wilson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
