Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCLEOD v. CHAPMAN
as 7:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
TRACY CHAPMAN
Petitioner:
ROBERT BRUCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
T-MOBILE, SOUTHEASTERN STAGES INC, O'REILLY AUTO PARTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roether et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Isabella Amor, State of Georgia, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Ambassador Patrick Roether and Hollie Roether
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CRESPO v. GEORGIA
as 3:2020cv00038
Defendant:
HENRY HUFF, JERI COLLYN BLAKEMAN, LANCE SAVAGE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYAN CRESPO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaRoche et al v. Chapman et al
as 2:2019cv00118
Defendant:
James Stenander, Jason Turner, Michael Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence LaRoche, III and Parker Laroche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
