Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McNeilly v. Norman et al
as 1:2017cv00286
Plaintiff:
Mary McNeilly
Defendant:
Alan Norman , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , Durwin Briscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00485
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HICKS v. MOUNT AIRY-SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
HICKS, WILLIAM ALFRED HICKS, JR. and BILLY HICKS
Defendant:
MOUNT AIRY-SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, JOHN SPRINGTHORPE, DONALD L. HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Evans v. Griffin, et al
as 7:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
J.K. Griffin, Ken Miller, Robbie Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Monk et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Derrick J. Monk, Sr. and D.J.M., Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, William Graham, Denise Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.